Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.

Not Every Web3 Protocol Needs a Native Token

2025/12/11 06:52

When developing a new protocol, the default assumption is nearly always that a new native token must follow. Most blockchains and Web3 frameworks rely on cryptoeconomic systems comprising incentives and penalties to maintain protocol security and deter malicious actors.

\ However, deploying a new Web3 application as a "rollup" or "Layer Two" solution has been common in recent years. Whether implemented as a rollup on Ethereum, a parachain on Polkadot, or a subnet on Avalanche, the primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees.

The Obstacles: Justification for a Separate Token

Currently, the technical challenge of building a blockchain has been significantly mitigated through the availability of numerous SDKs and frameworks. Tools such as the Polkadot SDK and Cosmos SDK allow developers to utilize templates and rapidly launch a functional network, complete with all the standard features one would expect from any standard Web3 protocol.

\ Despite these advancements, a major barrier remains: identity, namely, ensuring we have some semblance of sybil resistance.

\ ==We still need a way to ensure bad actors can’t utterly spam or harm our network, which is most of the main reasons why economic aspects of cryptoeconomic systems like Proof of Work or Proof of Stake exist.==

\ Tokenomics then becomes a subsequent concern: if a project's token model is flawed or poorly conceived, it can undermine the entire effort, regardless of the quality of the underlying technology.

\ The necessity of designing and securing an entirely separate cryptoeconomic network presents a considerable hurdle for developers and startups whose core mission is building a superior, more resilient application or infrastructure, not managing a monetary policy.

\ Fortunately, the landscape is evolving, providing a solution to this complexity.

The Solution: Utilizing the “Parent” Network's Token

If a new protocol builds upon an existing network and deploys as a rollup/Layer Two, they (should) inherently, well, inherit their security from the parent network.

\ This raises a critical question: why not simply use the parent network's native token for all operations? Everything is already set up; we just need to make sure that we can safely perform checks and balances when transferring to and from the parent network. ==In the future, it might be possible to launch a rollup without a token at all, if we solve the Sybil problem, and assuming we have a parent network that provides security for our rollup/service.==

\ Polkadot permits the launch of a “tokenless” parachain. The parachain can instead use the Layer One's token (such as DOT on Polkadot) to facilitate all operations, including transaction fees and security mechanisms.

\ This approach frees up the team to concentrate on ==building solutions and core application logic==. In other words, you focus more on getting your protocol running so you can build your resilient application/infrastructure rather than being bogged down by token mechanics.

A Live Example: EduChain

This concept is not merely theoretical. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team (of which I am a part of!) has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration of this tokenless configuration. It utilizes the parent network’s token, specifically the PAS token on the Paseo testnet, as its functional currency.

\ The EduChain configuration operates via a reserve-backed transfer using XCM, which functions as follows:

\

  • Zero initial supply: the chain commences with a zero total supply of its own potential token. To fund a network account, a cross-chain transfer via XCM must be initiated from the parent network (Paseo).

  • The reserve and the sovereign account: The parachain designates a system parachain (such as the Paseo Asset Hub) as a reserve for the parent token (PAS). Upon the parachain's creation, a specialized account, known as a sovereign account, is automatically generated on the parent chain exclusively for the parachain.

  • Transferring PAS:

  • When a user sends PAS from their account on the parent chain (Paseo) to the parachain (EduChain), the PAS is deposited into the parachain's sovereign account on the parent chain, where it functions as the reserve.

  • Simultaneously, a new, local asset representing PAS is minted on the parachain and credited to the user's account there.

  • When a user sends this local asset back to the parent chain, the local asset is burned on the parachain, and the corresponding PAS amount is unlocked and transferred from the sovereign account back to the beneficiary's account on the parent chain.

    \

This XCM mechanism ensures that every unit of PAS on the parachain is fully backed 1:1 by actual PAS held in a secure reserve on the parent network, thereby eliminating the necessity for a distinct, project-specific token.

\ As a general note, a parachain controls its own local representation of an asset and could, in principle, change those balances according to its own governance. However, Asset Hub — as the reserve location — maintains the canonical reserve‑backed accounting for that asset across the network, and parachains are expected to use XCM instructions via Asset Hub so that this accounting remains correct and consistent.

\ For comprehensive details on EduChain and its operational mechanics, documentation is available at: https://web3educhain.xyz/

Conclusion

This article aimed to highlight the significant potential of delegating the economic and security concerns of a rollup or Layer Two to the parent network itself. By employing reserve-backed XCM transfers, a project can completely circumvent the substantial difficulties associated with launching a new Web3 protocol, allowing the team to dedicate its full effort to building a superior application and addressing real-world problems.

\ Individuals interested in implementing this solution can explore launching a parachain on Paseo, as well as the EduChain repo for more information:

\

  • Parachain Zero To Hero Tutorials
  • Web3 Educhain

\

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

BitGo expands its presence in Europe

BitGo expands its presence in Europe

The post BitGo expands its presence in Europe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BitGo, global leader in digital asset infrastructure, announces a significant expansion of its presence in Europe. The company, through its subsidiary BitGo Europe GmbH, has obtained an extension of the license from BaFin (German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority), allowing it to offer regulated cryptocurrency trading services directly from Frankfurt, Germany. This move marks a decisive step for the European digital asset market, offering institutional investors the opportunity to access secure, regulated cryptocurrency trading integrated with advanced custody and management services. A comprehensive offering for European institutional investors With the extension of the license according to the MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation, initially obtained in May 2025, BitGo Europe expands the range of services available for European investors. Now, in addition to custody, staking, and transfer of digital assets, the platform also offers a spot trading service on thousands of cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. Institutional investors can now leverage BitGo’s OTC desk and a high-performance electronic trading platform, designed to ensure fast, secure, and transparent transactions. Aggregated access to numerous liquidity sources, including leading market makers and exchanges, allows for trading at competitive prices and high-quality executions. Security and Regulation at the Core of BitGo’s Strategy According to Brett Reeves, Head of European Sales and Go Network at BitGo, the goal is clear: “We are excited to strengthen our European platform and enable our clients to operate smoothly, competitively, and securely.§By combining our institutional custody solution with high-performance trading execution, clients will be able to access deep liquidity with the peace of mind that their assets will remain in cold storage, under regulated custody and compliant with MiCA.” The security of digital assets is indeed one of the cornerstones of BitGo’s offering. All services are designed to ensure that investors’ assets remain protected in regulated cold storage, minimizing operational and counterparty risks.…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:28